That’s if you add up the tax and spending in those years cumulatively, and if you make a number of assumptions about Scotland’s finances, all of which are subject to argument. These adverts enable local businesses to get in front of their target audience – the local community. English resentment towards Scotland's subsidies has nearly doubled in just seven years. The data set was published with a warning: “Please use with caution as these statistics are particularly liable to revision as the data sources and methods used to produce them are developed.”. Scotland emerged from the First and Second Wars of Scottish Independen… The geography is important because nationalist forecasts of an independent Scotland’s future wealth often depend on the idea that would be given a “geographical share” of the North Sea assets after independence. Scottish Government measures to ensure free university education and prescription charges were cited as reasons for a negative view of Scotland, the study said. Spending was £1200 more per head in Scotland than in the rest of the UK in 2015-16, while taxes raised per head were £400 lower, a gap of £1600. We do have official statistics on Scotland’s finances, covering subsequent years. The Barnett Formula does indeed state that the Scots receive a larger share of the national pie than any other British region per head of population. "Scots will subsidise the rest of the UK to the tune of almost £800 a head in this coming year alone. Normally we mark the anniversary with a small reflection and taking of stock over how things are going, but this year we couldn’t be bothered – we’d already mentioned readership stats in August.. Leave voters were the most likely to be of this opinion, especially Tory Leave voters, two thirds of whom say Scotland benefits most from being part of the Union, compared to one in five who think all parts of the UK benefit equally from its membership. Ian Blackford said Scotland “has subsidised the rest of the UK in most of the last 40-year period”. Yet two conclusions seem clear. Scotland has 99% GDP only behind London and SouthEast. Does England subsidise Scotland? If Scotland get independence will England still have to subsidise them? The lack of directly comparable data for the most recent years is particularly important, because oil prices crashed after these experimental figures were published, weakening the fiscal position of a notional independent Scotland. Jake: 1/10/12 3:52 PM: Was having this discussion with a Scot and he was adamant that with the oil, Scotland paid more money to England than it received in subsidies. The stats only cover 1980/81 to 2011/12 (that’s 32 years), and recent years are missing. The deal struck recently between the SNP and the Treasury means that income taxpayers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland will continue to subsidise Scotland … READ MORE: Latest poll reveals support for Scottish independence at 50 percent, The Ashcroft report states: “The widespread view that the English ‘pay for Scotland’ goes hand-in-hand with the knowledge that Scots get certain things – free NHS prescriptions and free university education – that are not available in England: in other words, that English taxpayers are paying for the Scots to have things that they don’t get themselves.”, “Moreover, it rankled with some of our English voters that Scotland seemed to show little affinity for the Union they felt they were paying to maintain: ‘It’s always Scotland. It won't last > >> and we will have to pay for it hugely when he gets the power he wants. Next, he invaded the northern Kingdom of Scotland, kicking off the First War of Scottish Independence (that’s the one in Braveheart). Overall, just over half believe that England subsidises Scotland financially. Is it true? In 1999 A Darling,G Brown and T Blair annexed 6000 square miles of the NORTH SEA to England via a statutory instrument thus avoiding having to go through parliament.Scotland lost 6 oil fields by this action.What effect does have on Scotlad and England’s READ MORE: Huge majority of Tory Leave voters would ditch Scotland to secure Brexit. Tories were the most likely to say that England provides financial support to Scotland – three quarters believe this to be the case, and most of them are unhappy about it. The report added: “Many English Leave voters saw many parallels between some Scots’ desire for self-determination and their own wish to leave the EU: ‘It’s similar in the way we want to control our own destiny. Back in 2013 Professor Brian Ashcroft of the University of Strathclyde looked at these experimental figures and found that the extra spending per capita on Scotland cancelled out the extra tax revenue almost exactly over the 32 years covered by the stats. In … Ian Blackford said Scotland “has subsidised the rest of the UK in most of the last 40-year period”. But there is another side to the argument: tax receipts have often been higher per head in Scotland, but so has public spending. The poll of 1558 English adults found respondents were more likely to think Scotland benefits disproportionately from the Union than Northern Ireland does. An SNP spokesman told FactCheck: “We have demonstrated to you using official government statistics that Ian Blackford’s comments are correct. Wings Over Scotland marked its ninth birthday earlier this month. Recent polling carried out in September by Lord Ashcroft found a majority for Scottish independence. To be honest, we totally forgot about it until someone reminded us. A new poll from Lord Ashcroft has found that the majority of people in England believe they subsidise Scotland and other parts of the Union.. Scotland does get more in UK public spending than it puts back in revenues - but how much depends heavily on how you account for North Sea oil. It is important that we continue to promote these adverts as our local businesses need as much support as possible during these challenging times. Rather than sending our wealth south to London … For 42 years, public spending across Northern Ireland, Scotland, England and Wales has been based around something called the Barnett formula. Northern Ireland and Scotland attracted the highest expenditure per head, at £14,020 and £13,050 respectively, with the lowest expenditure per person in the south-east and east of England … Back in 2013, it was possible to use these figures to back the idea that Scotland paid slightly more into the UK’s coffers than it took out. It would be interesting to update Prof Ashcroft’s findings to construct a time series of fully comparable data. Although Tory Leavers were also the most likely to say that England subsidises Northern Ireland, there was a notable difference in that they are more likely to be happy with that arrangement. Some 40 per cent of people in England believe the system which gives Scots more public funding per … Does Scotland really Subsidise England. Agricultural activity occurs in most rural locations, it is concentrated in East Anglia (for crops) and the South West (livestock). The gulf in state spending between Scotland and England has hit a record £1,600 per head. But there are a few difficulties. Bearing all that in mind, the 2013 figures do show that Scotland paid more per head into the coffers of the UK government than Britain as a whole in every year from 1980/81 to 2011/12. In 2014/15 however, North Sea revenue had declined to the point that the revenue collected was slightly less than Scotland’s share of the population, whether No… Agriculture in the United Kingdom uses 69% of the country's land area, employs 1.5% of its workforce (476,000 people) and contributes 0.6% of its gross value added (£9.9 billion). Ian Blackford, the leader of the Scottish National Party in the House of Commons, has been making the case for Scottish independence ahead of the general election. This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network. The only figures we can find that go back far enough to shed any light on Ian Blackford’s claim are experimental stats published in 2013 which cover the 32 years from 1980/81 to 2011/12. Pro-EU English voters tended to believe that Brexit makes Scottish independence more likely, while Leave voters think it makes no difference, the poll found. In 1974 the British government asked Professor Gavin McCrone to investigate what the finances of an independent Scotland would look like and the answer was that Scotland would be so embarrassingly rich that the UK government had to mark the report as secret and hide it from the public lest it spark calls for indipendence. Huge majority of Tory Leave voters would ditch Scotland to secure Brexit, Latest poll reveals support for Scottish independence at 50 percent, Scottish independence soars ahead as Ashcroft poll predicts Yes win​. A new Ashcroft poll found English adults were more likely to think Scotland benefits disproportionately from the Union than Northern Ireland does. Get involved with the news in your community, This website and associated newspapers adhere to the Independent Press Standards Organisation's Editors' Code of Practice. Will England tier restrictions cost ‘almost £1bn’ a day? This point has never actually been conceded by the UK government. so if scotland is revenue neutral, but london subsidies the rest of the country by 20%, why does scotland get an extra £1500 per head more than london. That’s around 8% of the total revenue in the UK.In previous years the proportion of Scotland’s revenue collected has exceeded its proportion of the UK population, once North Sea revenue is included. The idea here is based on a counterfactual that an independent Scotland would have generated a large surplus when oil prices peaked in the 1980s, and would have had lower borrowing costs than the UK. As a subscriber, you are shown 80% less display advertising when reading our articles. When asked, 43% said they hoped Scotland remained part of the Union. But they haven’t been updated or revised since 2013. The only statistics we know of that cover four decades of Scotland’s finances are these experimental datapublished by the Scottish government in 2013. Scotland Subsidises England Archived. Photograph: Getty. Ian Blackford, the leader of the Scottish National Party in the House of Commons, states that Scotland has subsidised the rest of … So it is possible to construct the argument from these figures that Scotland paid slightly more in tax than it received in public spending per head from 1980/81 to 2011/12 – largely driven by the oil boom years of the ’80s. If you have a complaint about the editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then please contact the editor here. Scotland want their independence, we want our independence from the EU for roughly the same reasons … Taking back control.’ “Remain voters also sympathised – especially with the wish not to be ‘taken out’ of the EU – but often ascribed more noble motives to the independence movement: ‘With Brexit, a lot of it was prejudice, ‘we don’t want foreigners in our country’. Data returned from the Piano 'meterActive/meterExpired' callback event. How does government decide which areas of England go into which Tiers. The only statistics we know of that cover four decades of Scotland’s finances are these experimental data published by the Scottish government in 2013. But there are a few difficulties. If you are dissatisfied with the response provided you can contact IPSO here. ©Copyright 2001-2020. 0 psy7ch Posts: 9,890 The higher tax revenues are largely explained by the fact that most of the UK’s oil and gas assets are located in the North Sea, off the coast of Scotland. Other complaints centred on the perceived unfairness of the Barnett formula and notions that Scots “hate the English”. The word subsidise is a drastic oversimplification of extremely complex public expenditure. The UK produces less than 60% of the food it consumes. The stats only cover 1980/81 to 2011/12 (that’s 32 years), and recent years are missing. This is at the heart of the “Scotland subsidises the rest of the UK” argument. But the Scottish government has not updated the experimental statistics since 2013. “UK government figures make it absolutely clear that Scotland has subsidised the rest of the UK in most of the last 40-year period.” Ian Blackford. THE majority of people in England believe they subsidise Scotland , according to a new Lord Ashcroft poll. Data from the UK Government’s Office for National Statistics demonstrates in simple terms the distribution of personal wealth in the UK. But the overall balance was close, according to one detailed analysis: even making concessions to nationalist arguments about Scotland’s likely historic debt, higher UK public spending on Scotland almost completely cancelled out any surplus created by “Scottish” oil. The data set was published with a warning:“Please use with caution as these statistics are particularly liable to revision as the data source… Where does Scotland’s wealth go (if it doesn't stay here)? Those ads you do see are predominantly from local businesses promoting local services. "The deficit per head in Scotland was £2,824 last year," says Nils Pratley in The Guardian. It's the other way round, Scotland subsidies England. Holocaust Denier Alistair McConnachie aka Manky Shirt/Manky Jaiket at the All Under One Banner march for independence in Edinburgh 05.10.2019, admitting that Scotland DOES subsidise … The focus groups in the Ashcroft poll were conducted with voters of different political outlooks in Bexley, south-east London, and Newcastle upon Tyne. With Scotland it’s not as emotional.’”. The fact that the Scottish government has not updated or revised these figures since 2013 makes it impossible for us to stand up Mr Blackford’s claim at the moment. But they don’t cover the 1980s, or tell us whether estimates for those years included in the experimental data would now be revised. They hate the English’; ‘I don’t think the people who voted to stay were particularly attached – I think they just thought it was in their best interests.’”, READ MORE: Scottish independence soars ahead as Ashcroft poll predicts Yes win​. Well considering Scotland has rose in the GDP rankings from 4th to 3rd place out of the 12 regions in the UK, the answer clearly has to be no England does not subsidize Scotland. These Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland figures cover 1998/99 to 2018/19, and include revisions to some of the historical data included in the experimental release. In the late 13th century, King Edward I conquered the western Principality of Wales, claiming it as a territory of England. There is nothing you have presented that suggests Ian Blackford’s comments were not true.”, Brexit did not speed up UK vaccine authorisation, Government won’t say how much tiered restrictions will cost economy. They say ‘I’m not British, I’m Scottish’; ‘With the Barnett Formula they come out ahead, and they’re still moaning’; ‘I’ve got nothing against Scotland but if they want to be independent let’s stop paying the funds.’ “Indeed, some felt that those who had voted against independence in 2014 had done so for purely economic reasons: ‘My Scottish friends are worried about their pensions if they become independent. Does England subsidise Scotland? Its position throughout the 2014 referendum was that the division of UK assets and debts would all be up for negotiation after an independence vote. A majority of English voters believe Scotland is subsidised by England, a new poll has revealed. What we can say is that, following reforms, the average subsidy per hectare of moorland in England increased from £30 in 2014 to £56 in 2015. A Gannett Company. > >>> running Scotland mount up, and they have to raise taxes to pay for it > >>> all, he can have his "finest hour" > > >> I am living in Scotland and expect HUGE tax rises before long:( Salmond > >> is keeping us sweet atm with free this and free that. The SNP are calling for a second independence referendum and say: “Next year we intend to offer the people of Scotland a choice over their future.”. The last referendum in 2014 was marked by heated debate over the economic prospects of an independent Scotland, and Mr Blackford repeated a claim that was put forward by nationalists at the time, that Scotland has historically “subsidised the rest of the UK”. The evidence shows that tax revenues per head in Scotland have been considerably higher than the UK – that has unquestionably subsidised UK public spending over the period. First, if Brexit presents challenges for London, with its heavy weighting towards financial services, the problem is the rest of the UK’s too. This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies. They were marked “particularly liable to revision” – but the Scottish government has not revised them. THE majority of people in England believe they subsidise Scotland, according to a new Lord Ashcroft poll.. Leave voters were the most likely to be of this opinion, especially Tory Leave voters, two thirds of whom say Scotland benefits most from being part of the Union, compared to one in five who think all parts of the UK benefit equally from its membership. Published from its offices at 200 Renfield Street Glasgow and printed in Scotland by Newsquest (Herald & Times) a division of Newsquest Media Group Ltd, registered in England & Wales with number 01676637 at Loudwater Mill, Station Road, High Wycombe HP10 9TY – a Gannett company. “We have also demonstrated how your argument about public spending does not take into account the costs to Scotland of servicing UK debt that would not have been required had we been independent. In fairness to nationalist arguments, the Ashcroft analysis did show that Scotland paid in slightly more than it took out per head, if you accepted that interest payments on UK debt should be subtracted from the accounts. But the calculation all depends on which years you include in the analysis, the assumption that most North Sea oil and gas is “Scotland’s” and the controversial idea that taxpayers in a hypothetical independent Scotland of the past would have paid little or no interest on national debt. The Kingdom of England, formed in 927, gained the first U.K. state other than itself through invasion. By Scotsman ... (while four in ten say they don’t know whether they subsidise Scotland or not). It's a simple question but not one often asked, probably as most economics bloggers like myself get bogged down in numbers and over-complicate the issue. Nevertheless, official statistics on Scotland’s finances calculate how much tax revenue from a “geographical share” of North Sea oil and gas flows into UK coffers. If you accept that the most of the oil and gas assets are really “Scottish”, it’s right to say historically, Scotland did often contribute more per capita than that UK average, particularly in the 1980s, when oil prices were sky-high and North Sea hydrocarbons were very lucrative for the UK. I always > Scotland’s total public sector revenue was just under £54 billion in 2015/16. The report in its entirety can be read here. But given the total area of grouse moors in England, it’s almost certain that total subsidies were worth significantly less than £84 million a year in 2015, and remain worth less than this today. Are you sure you want to delete this comment? Showing 1-73 of 73 messages. Government spending in Scotland averaged £10,212 …